Good on you, Patrick and Sarah! ... See MoreSee Less
2 days ago
I think it’s important to say something.
Get vaccinated.
Against COVID. Against the flu, measles — whatever.
I’m on “the right” of politics (whatever that means these days), and I believe that Vaccination is overwhelmingly safe and effective.
If you have questions, good. But get your information from your Doctor. Not your Chiro, or your friends, or a Facebook group.
I was disturbed when I read this passage in the linked story:
‘19 per cent of those people identifying to the right side of politics said they were "very unlikely" to take the vaccine, compared to 8 per cent of those in the "centre" and 4 per cent for those on the "left".
"It is a concerning emerging trend, the left-right divide is quite stark.
"We must remember most people on the left and the right are willing to vaccinate, [the] data shows this.
"But what we don't want to see with immunisation in Australia is a political polarisation around it, we don't want to go the way of the US and parts of European countries where we see even bigger divides in the attitudes between the left and the right."’
...This is not a question on which there should be a political divide. Not in Australia. We’re better than this.
www.abc.net.au/news/2021-03-05/australia-covid-vaccine-survey/13203170 ... See MoreSee Less
4 days ago
My mother read it to me.
I read it to my son.
I read it to my nephews.
What an almighty storm in a teacup. ... See MoreSee Less
6 days ago
A recent trip to the Australian Museum in Sydney revealed to me an unexpected Hawkesbury connection.
The famous exhibit of a skeletal horse and his rider is known to generations of museum visitors, usually as "The Bone Ranger".
The horse is "Sir Hercules", a champion stud bred in 1843 at "Clifton", which was on Percival Street between Richmond and Windsor, adjacent to the current air-base. He's been on exhibition since 1873.
Sir Hercules sired a Melbourne Cup winner ('The Barb', 1866). The rider isn't the original rider, but I'd love to know what their story is! ... See MoreSee Less
1 week ago
Concern from HRCC over funding cut from state government ... See MoreSee Less
1 week ago
HAWKESBURY LIBERAL COUNCILLORS SEND STRONG MESSAGE AGAINST INAPPROPRIATE SUBDIVISION IN KURRAJONG AND KURMOND
At the Hawkesbury City Council meeting this week, your Liberal Councillors helped to carry a motion to end the ‘Kurrajong-Kurmond investigation area’ process.
We believed the proposed rezoning and adoption of the 'Structure Plan' would have encouraged the lodgement of further subdivision proposals. We felt it would have sent a message to landowners or developers that we were encouraging subdivision west of the river.
The motion we passed abandons either rezoning or the Structure Plan, adding that Council 'Not encourage the lodgement of additional individual Planning Proposals within the Kurmond- Kurrajong Investigation Area for rural residential development.'
The motion ensures already-lodged planning proposals will be granted due-process, and continue to be assessed against relevant criteria.
A 2017 survey of Kurrajong and Kurmond residents showed that only 32% of residents supported developing the whole investigation area.
Although it is true that anyone can submit an unsolicited proposal at any time to subdivide their property, they will still be assessed against increasingly strict criteria of both our LEP and the Greater Sydney Commission's residential strategy.
Two Councillors recused themselves because they or their families, live or own property in the subject area, including Liberal Sarah Richards.
Extraordinarily, the Greens and Independent Councillors voted not only to adopt the structure plan, but to have Council prepare a planning proposal to rezone the land identified in the plan.
We encourage those with an interest in the debate to listen to the Council webcast.
soundcloud.com/user-423594224/item-30-cp-update-on-kurmond ... See MoreSee Less
1 week ago
Andrew Mortimer
Very extensive,I would love to see you do this for a true representation using the last percentage that was changed by Bob Porter and voted by the last liberal block,because Bowen Mountain were hit hard & our rates rose astronomically,we don’t have all the services you listed that residential have,we are like the rural properties but our land is nowhere near the 3mill mark
I’d like to see them look at all the options, not just this Liberal stuck-in-the-mud 50% one which is not used by virtually any surrounding council’s. Nathan’s numbers also seem to misrepresent the 50% – it is worked out over the whole Hawkesbury, not on individual properties, so the description he gives can be a little misleading. He’s done a great job on it though, just a shame something similar could not be done in time for the councillors to be given a more detailed analysis as part of the decision-making process.
The St Albans, NSW community has been payiing for services which they don’t get for years and yet to get the council to do anything in our area they now want to put our rates up. Not good enough. Its impossible to get decent Road work done, Clearing of noxious weeds, our Local park maintained, paths are over grown with weeds, Council tennis courts left to abandon. Why should our rates go up for services we already pay for but do not receive.
After the great job the St Albans people did in respect to the Commons, it surprises me that we don’t hear more of these problems. With the new General Manager being a very hands-on guy, I’d be getting in touch not only with council but the individual councillors to get some action. Things are changing, and hopefully for the better ?
Belinda Ripolles Astill
Brilliant work
how about we just amalgamate with Hills and throw the current tossers away. Hawkesbury council area has so much tourism potential which is wasted by this ridiculous council. Not to mention the way land gets subdivided in Hawkesbury, no sewer service, just vacuum systems that are guaranteed to fail, how about handing the wastewater assets over to Sydney water, get someone competent to run them. Sydney Water customers pay less for sewage services than Hawkesbury council
Read the Hawkesbury Tourism Strategy? Seen which political party dominates the tourism committee? Seen where the $3 million our State member promised is being spent? I don’t know why you think council is responsible for wasting tourism potential, it’s not like they have the money to advertise ?????. Do some research, get informed and come back with a sensible option instead of bagging the few people who actually are putting their time and effort into trying to rectify the mess they inherited please.
Pingback: New land valuations give little relief for rates in most Hawkesbury suburbs | Hawkesbury City Councillor Nathan Zamprogno